[nepenthe]

As a former PSYOPer, I am disappointed that Rolling Stone Magazine did not use the correct term which is PSYOP and not PSY-Ops or PSYOPS.

[spin]

That's what bothers you? Not the subversion of democracy?

[nepenthe2]

Can you provide me a single instance of democracy that is independent of PSYOP?

Human life is about effecting change from the first instance of cognition.

Perhaps you can share what it is that bothers you enough to prompt your question to me?

*Note: Ironic that with my username, I forgot my password.

[spin]

"Perhaps you can share what it is that bothers you enough to prompt your question to me?"

I was noting the incongruity between: 1 - the weight of the article (whether you agree or disagree) and 2 - your criticism of the article (nitpicking capitalization). Hence my comment.

[nepenthe2]

Nitpicking I think is perceived by the relevant knowledge/experience of the subject matter.

Mac to MAC. RAMs to RAM. Very different things.

There is no such thing as Psy-Ops/PSYOPS/PSYOPs at least according to the US Department of Defense. There is only the singular PSYOP. To have interviewed a commissioned officer and present a report whose whole article is on a single subject, I am disappointed that the magazine could not throughly investigate what it is they were reporting on. An article that implicates others (whether they are a general officer or not) in some light that is less becoming of their expected role bears extra responsibility to be a credible source.