[nitemice]

The only other "security risk" I can imagine such a read-only wiki could present is if it documents something that could be considered "risky" from a security perspective. That would make this more of a censorship situation.

[moonchild]

> We still have the data, and as mentioned above, we will work to migrate the top content into various official resources. In the meantime, we’re investigating how we can make this content available, even in a rudimentary way.

This indicates otherwise.