Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by matz1 2272 days ago
Yes but the risk is lower then not having grocery store at all. People still need to eat.
1 comments

right well to solve that problem, you close down one store and not all of them. only the one where someone tested positive and only until that store can be cleaned. There are no towns on the planet that have only a Whole Foods and not 350 other food stores. you open the store again once it's been deep cleaned. nobody starves and that's a total straw man argument.