|
|
|
|
|
by bad_user
2276 days ago
|
|
End-to-end encryption is hard to implement, might cost more processing or bandwidth or storage (depending on the product) and does not yield benefits for companies interested in processing user data. If it's not clearly advertised on the front page, _emphasized_ and not a foot note, then it's NOT e2e encrypted. Example: https://signal.org |
|
For group calls, it depends on how it's implemented, but many group calls are implemented using what's called a Selective Forwarding Unit (SFU). One benefit of SFUs is that they take much less processing for the server than the other kinds (where the video is re-encoded by the server). For those types of group calls, e2e encryption can be implemented with negligible increases to processing and bandwidth.
However, you are correct that it is harder to implement correctly. And it does prevent certain features to be added to the product, such as recording and server-based processing of information (for example, meeting transcriptions).
(I used to work at Google on WebRTC, Duo, and Hangouts, but now work on video calling at Signal).