|
|
|
|
|
|
by lotsofpulp
2267 days ago
|
|
|
Bezos doesn’t even have $100B, so the premise of your argument is nonsense. Owning shares of something isn’t the same as liquid cash. And valuing 1 share at the most recent market closing price the same as a founder liquidating their whole investment is also nonsense. FYI, all those worlds richest lists are clickbait. |
|
|
Oh, so that's how you're going to handwave this argument today. Got it, I wouldn't have bothered writing all of that up if I knew you were just going to stick your head in the sand.
Here's what happens when your boy Bezos gets too much power:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-30/amazon-wo...
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5dmeka/whole-foods-employ...
There need to be more checks and balances on individuals who possess this much power, or they need not be allowed to attain so much power in the first place. Your technicalities do nothing to fix this problem which affect tens of thousands of workers in this country, who are being forced to expose themselves to a deadly virus (or go hungry) so Bezos can buy another mansion and bang some more models. But I don't care that much, I suppose. If it isn't done democratically it won't be long before heads are rolling.