|
|
|
|
|
|
by krapp
2278 days ago
|
|
|
There's nothing morally wrong with it at all. On the contrary, the moral argument behind free software is that the work belongs equally to everyone, not to the original authors. There's nothing in the free software ethos that requires "originality" as a prerequisite to redistribute software for any reason, including donations. The only thing the Gimp authors have a moral claim to is the name and logo. |
|
|