|
|
|
|
|
by cairo_x
2270 days ago
|
|
What is the main value of link analysis? As far as cause and effect and the larger picture (especially WRT the time domain), a lot of it seems like reading signs in chicken gizzards. The more you put in, the less sense they make. There's only so much useful information to be gleaned from this kind of geometry. Fingering out and tracing cause and effect is just about impossible. I wish someone would come up with a half decent top-down timeline creation and analysis tool. |
|
Documentation mode is "just" recording relationships between assets so they are readily understood and visually obvious. This can be used to break new analysts into cases and to publish reports. These also serve as good starting points to pick an investigation back up. This is arguably the "easier" mode to implement since it just requires a visual graph with different entity types.
Exploratory mode means populating the graph through "transforms" (in Maltego-lingo). Going from one node to more nodes and relationships by attempting to "pivot" from a node using a certain datasource. As an example from infrastructure analysis you'd say "here's an IP, now do a transform which creates vertices for all hostnames that point to that IP". This mode is harder to get right since there's always explosion of edges and also since it's just mind-numbing work to implement transforms for all the data-sources.