[dang]

Comments which make grandiose claims about getting banned on HN almost never come with links. There's a reason for that: the claims exceed reality, and a link to what actually happened would reveal that. Typically, the reason why we banned someone is very different from the reason they give when they come back here to linklessly declaim about it. This is one place where absence of evidence is evidence of absence.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Edit: it's easy to make authoritative-sounding claims, but to be taken seriously, you should supply links so readers can make up their own minds. In the majority of cases, we ban accounts for breaking the site guidelines after multiple requests to stop (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). (I'm talking about established accounts. We handle brand new accounts that break the site guidelines differently.)