| >You are a biological system. That is the language of systems theory. You are welcome to use the Church-Turing-Deutsch principle as a semantic. >A massive, noisy and dynamical system of interactions we can never hope to model in fidelity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometry_of_interaction We are already modeling it. The only argument here is the degree of fidelity required or possible. > You exist because of unstable equilibria and tiny little proteins pushing against entropy
>We can communicate... Begging the question: why do proteins exist? Entropy, Information, Communication. Heh!
That is the language of Information Theory. >We’re pattern recognisers Yes. That is what I said - computer/language recogniser.
If there's no pattern/structure you can't parse it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_recognition However you define/conceptualise us, every time you use the word “I” or “we” you are exemplifying recursion. That is the great thing about self-locating beliefs - they are unfalsifiable. |