|
|
|
|
|
|
by peterjussi
2279 days ago
|
|
|
Right, the main difference there would be that the changes get combined into one squash commit rather than a merge commit. Mostly an aesthetic choice, so I could definitely see both as viable. If I wanted to move changes between branches I would probably prefer a squash rather than a regular merge, as that will look cleaner in the history. |
|
|