|
|
|
|
|
by xaxsacsdaffbnk
2286 days ago
|
|
I have no issue believing you can measure sea levels at certain places. The question is, how do you mix all those measurements together to determine a global sea level number? Afaik many things affect local measurements, like storms and tides. For example, if you measure at three points in the US, and one point in Japan, how are the measurements weighted? Suppose a storm is blowing in the US, increasing the measurements by 1m. How is it being accounted for? |
|
That's why you don't measure "three points in the US and one point in Japan". You measure thousands of points all around the world, so if storms affect two or three of them for a day, the global result isn't significantly affected. For instance, just the French observation network is made up of 90 stations that cover enough of the globe to be enough on their own for measuring a 2 mm rise over two months (near real-time data available on ftp://ftp.sonel.org/tidegauge/rmsl/Demerliac/RAW/).
It's really not as complicated as you think it is, the basic science behind global sea level measurements was established in the 18th century.