|
|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
2276 days ago
|
|
|
IANAMedic: I assumed you/a loved one had CF. As I understand it CF creates a thick mucus that blocks the lungs. But Covid19 reportedly destroys pilii, and the cells that bare them, and when the immune response kicks in fully it attacks lung tissue as well as the virus. _If_ this understanding of mine is corrext, then it seems clearing the lungs in CF opens them to take oxygen that's there (if the mucus is moved the underlying lung function is still enough), but in Covid19 even if cleared the lung tissue is damaged and can't process enough oxygen from a regular supply; people need higher pressure and/or higher saturation oxygen for a period in order to recover lung function. Maybe I'm wrong. It's certainly not wrong to share how you clear lungs affected by CF if you're explicit about any limitations in your knowledge. As an example of this that seems counterfactual to me -- as a medically uninformed person -- BiPAP, which is commonly used for CF sufferers I gather, at least one critical care source suggests is not really useful for Covid19 (https://emcrit.org/ibcc/COVID19/#noninvasive_ventilation_(Bi... ) treatment. The problem with suggesting treatments is that people may resort to self-treatment alone and not seek proper medical care; that could cost lives. So I think your analysis is wrong if you're suggesting 'giving advice can't be harmful'. |
|
|
CF often results in significant lung damage. I used to have a hole in my left lung. I don't appear to have such anymore.
The tissue is often eaten away by infection over the course of years and a drop in lung function below a certain point is the typical reason for lung transplant. People with CF are the single largest recipient group for lung transplants, as far as I know and based on the figures I'm aware of.
So lung damage with CF is common and it is routinely quite substantial. They are kept functional with daily air clearance techniques that can be done independently. Some of them do not involve mechanical intervention.
Even if you have impaired lung function in terms of tissue damage, removing the fluids and phlegm can help the impaired tissues function as well as possible in spite of other issues.
I did my best to state up front that this will be helpful in some cases but not others. I did my best to define where it is likely to be helpful: Where you have fluid build up and inflammation as the primary reason you might need a ventilator. I already covered the fact that if there are other problems going on, this may not help you.
I initially suggested treatments in response to people asking what could be done on their own if there is no medical care available or from home because I happen to know a lot about that and I'm not seeing a lot of other people speak up or provide "reputable sources" for that kind of information.
I no longer belong to any CF lists in part because I have heard the same accusations before: That providing information about what works for me is somehow irresponsible, even though CF, like covid19, is very deadly and doctors don't really know how to fix it.
Somehow, keeping my mouth shut and letting them die is deemed to be the responsible thing to do and I honestly don't understand that position at all. It really sounds much more like "cover your ass legally" than "give a damn about the welfare of your fellow human being."
I've been careful in how I have framed my remarks and given limitations and provisos as best as possible.
I stand by my two suggestions that:
1. Widespread use of ventilators may foster nasty secondary infections and I'm unhappy at seeing the world rush to provide homemade ventilators instead of rushing to provide less invasive alternatives without such a risk.
2. If you have no other options and can't get appropriate medical care, here are a few things you can try if you are desperate and have no better answers and seem likely to die if you don't do something.
I am not responsible for people choosing to use that information under less dire circumstances and I don't believe it is somehow better to deny the world such information on the theory that a few people might do something stupid with it. People are dying because there aren't enough supplies to go around. Good information can be life saving.
I don't expect my lack of happiness about the rush to create ventilators to make much, if any, real difference. But maybe it will. Maybe someone who is a medical professional will take that to heart and it will help prevent a second pandemic of antibiotic resistant secondary infections.
I'm not suggesting "giving advice can't be harmful." I'm suggesting that, under the current conditions, denying ordinary people information because they aren't medical professionals and might misuse it is likely to be worse.