|
|
|
|
|
by salawat
2289 days ago
|
|
There is no way that is enforcible unless they can produce an example implementation to defend it, or at least to my understanding of how it works. If there's an IP lawyer in the house, do please correct me, but I don't think you can use a patent to go after someone without actually producing anything. It's intended to be a monopoly to protect the inventor while they scale up after all. Am I missing something here? Edit: Yep, I am. Apparently there is no requirement for you to actually have to make the thing you're patenting. This is ludicrous. |
|