[PragmaticPulp]

> In the USA, acne and pregnancy are often disqualifying conditions.

This is not true. Premiums and coverage are only allowed to vary by age and location, not preexisting conditions.

[throwqwerty]

you realize this is literally only as of the ACA in 2010? and if the trump administration has its way (there's a supreme court case on the docket to completely kill ACA) we're going back to that?

[umanwizard]

What’s your point? It’s true now.

[throwqwerty]

that there are literally active efforts working to make it not true

[baddox]

Yes, the past was different than the present.

[tinus_hn]

But what about the future? :)

[masonic]

The Trump administration is neither plaintiff nor defendant in the court case you refer to.

[throwqwerty]

is this a game of gotcha? i didn't say they were plaintiffs. i said they were exerting efforts. here are amicae briefs written by trump's DOJ

https://affordablecareactlitigation.files.wordpress.com/2019...

https://affordablecareactlitigation.files.wordpress.com/2019...

here are summary articles explaining trump's DOJ's efforts

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-he...

https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/trump-administrations-a...

so what is your point other than to mislead?

[masonic]

If filing a Friend of the Court brief counts as "having its way", then the ACLU "has its way" on a majority of SCOTUS cases.

[throwqwerty]

like I said: what is your point other than to mislead? you still have not made any positive claims