|
|
|
|
|
|
by mannykannot
2286 days ago
|
|
|
If that amount is for civil damages, I think that would be a separate matter, but the last two paragraphs of the article leave little doubt that he is, and that Uber is not picking up the tab unless he can force them to (...would it be in the interests of Google (Alphabet? Waymo?) to help him do so? It would hurt Uber. Could it do so, if it wanted to, e.g. by hiring lawyers on his behalf?) Update: The article has just been shortened, and the paragraphs on that issue have been removed... Update 2: they are back again, apparently slightly reworded, IIRC the original... |
|
|
I thought I was going crazy. I could swear it mentioned it but now it's gone.
> Update 2: they are back again, apparently slightly reworded, IIRC the original...
Not for me? It's gone still.