Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by adtac 2282 days ago
I know. And I'm saying if that was the rate they've historically added data to their dataset, it would've taken them 200,000+ years to get here. Which is why 100GB/mo is virtually nothing for NASA -- it doesn't match with their historical throughput.
1 comments

I see what you're saying. Yeah, I agree.