[TeMPOraL]

> But given that, how do we move forward? We shouldn't be stuck in the past forever.

Wikipedia is essentially a public utility now. It's not their responsibility to move technology forward by forcing their users to upgrade their machines. There's loads of other players that do that already.

> If their site requires heavy client-side code

It doesn't.

[tcd]

It's our collective responsibility to decide what user agents work with what platforms.

The beauty of the internet is that any website is free to decide as they see fit - if they don't want to support IE/Edge/etc then that is their choice.

No website is a 'public utility' bound by laws which dictate what browsers must be supported - that remains a free and open decision.

IE11 is a dead browser, and the sooner it breaks for good, the better.

[darkcha0s]

You seem to completely have missed what the foundation is about.