|
|
|
|
|
|
by sneak
2286 days ago
|
|
|
> A more hopeful interpretation. This can be a tool for good. It's not necessary for the state to have access. We already have access. The state has had realtime, direct access to the data without
a warrant or meaningful oversight on a query-by-query basis since the 14th of January, 2009, when Google joined the PRISM collection program. It would be a very simple matter to expand that access to send wider selections of data. It may already have the capability to perform such queries. |
|
|