[light3]

I'm on a P4 3Ghz at the moment, whereby I can hear my CPU buzzing away when its under load. On the .co.uk site the buzzing is audible, its taking >70% of the CPU, whereas on your site its nice and quiet taking just 6% of the CPU.

[ars]

I can not figure out how such a simple program can manage to take up 100% of my CPU, and despite that not be in sync with my actual clock (it's a random fraction of a second off).

Has he not heard of sleep(1) ? Saying "it's flash" is no excuse, flash is perfectly capable of sleeping.

[ZoFreX]

Updating a clock to display the correct time is actually difficult and involved, sleep(1) will not work! The problem reminds me of this Intel article on syncing video output [1]

Basically, sleep(1) won't always align with clock updates, so sometimes a given time will display for more or less time than a second. This can be observed by opening the clock widget on Windows XP for example, it's very noticeable. I don't actually know a nice way to do it, maybe updating 10 times per second or so?

[1] http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/video-frame-display... - it's down right now, one of the diagrams illustrates the problem well though: http://software.intel.com/file/3984

[nitrogen]

On POSIX systems, clock_nanosleep() can accept an absolute time argument.

  // In a real program one would probably not use time()
  // Also, some older pre-release versions of the realtime
  // kernel patches had the clock_nanosleep() and time() 
  // clocks out of sync by 0.5s (IIRC)
  for(;;) {
    struct timespec after_epoch = { .tv_sec = time(NULL) + 1, .tv_nsec = 0 };
    // Check for EINTR in a real program
    clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME, TIMER_ABSTIME, &after_epoch, NULL);
    printf("Tick\n");
  }

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/clo...

Unfortunately, this probably doesn't help with Flash or JavaScript clock demos.

[xenonite]

Rather useful in this case could be an adaptive method. First, you update every 50ms until you circled in the moment when the second toggles. Then you can do sleep(1) again and save resources.

Alternatively, use time() to only sleep the remaining timespan until the next second.

[scommab]

Well to get technical there isn't a "sleep" function in flash. The best you can do is use setTimeout, which will call a function back in a specified amount of time. Everything including screen drawing, mouse interaction, effects/animations, code execution, etc all run in a single thread, which means if you could actually sleep(1) it would lock everything up for the full second.