|
|
|
|
|
by pron
2288 days ago
|
|
Java has had the six-monthly feature releases (which were called "limited update" releases, as opposed to major and patch releases) for many years, with names like 7u4 or 8u20. They also had a support period of 6 months. For example, the 8u20 feature release got two patches, names 8u25 and 8u31, and then 8u40 came out and 8u20 no longer got patches. But people are confused by the choice to give those releases a new integer name now that major releases are gone. It is an extreme misunderstanding to think that Java does not have "backward compatibility guarantees of any kind." Backward compatibility is of the utmost importance (Java has never made breaking changes as big as Python or .NET have), but it is not absolute. It's never been absolute; it's just that while breaking changes were mostly accidental before (or to implementation details), Java now admits some changes to the spec. But note that those aren't the changes that people have noticed (the biggest ones were removing methods that no one used). The breaking changes that people notice are implementation changes that some libraries, due to technical debt, relied on. As more investment is being put into the JDK and it's changing more quickly, that technical debt is showing, but it's not because of breaking spec changes. |
|