|
|
|
|
|
by wbronitsky
2287 days ago
|
|
How bad is it for all these "old people" if they are dead? It would be really nice to hear compassion instead of worry about money. How about we keep people alive, then deal with the economy? Something tells me the country that can burn $2T in less than a week will be just fine until this passes. Talking about the long term health of the economy in terms that push people out into unsafe situations, when we have a virus that kills people in 3 weeks, borders on evil. There is one way to solve the virus problem: social isolation. There are infinite ways to solve made up economic problems we foist on ourselves. |
|
Economic factors should absolutely be taken into account. Money pays for life saving medication and treatments. Tax money from the economy pays for social medicine.
For example, 280,000 EXTRA people died from cancer between 2008-2010 in the OCED. When you consider heart disease, other indications, and the rest of the world, you are talking millions of lives.
Far more people could easily die from the economic fallout in the US than the virus.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...