|
|
|
|
|
by dagmx
2286 days ago
|
|
Meanwhile film studios go on with 300+ people without hitting the issue of people hitting the same asset files without needing locking. I think locking is a fine utility to have but I think a lot of workflows use it to workaround poor communication. And I think you're constraining your views of git to just your workflow. I've worked in a lot of scenarios where you need multiple remotes such as having an internal repo and an external one. And similarly there are lots of scenarios where having a decentralized copy of the report is very useful for being able to work in offline scenarios and compare multiple branches. Things like when commuting on a plane or being in low connection areas. I don't see how my view is git centric. I'm saying each VCS has very useful areas and equally big rough spots. The problem is that each VCS group believes there's is the only right system. |
|