|
|
|
|
|
by rectang
2293 days ago
|
|
Anecdotally: My mother is a retired RN with an "inactive" license in Washington state. She does elder care as a side gig for individual clients. She recently had to turn someone down because the patient was intubated; it's not legal for her to care for such a patient. If anything went wrong she could be both at risk of a lawsuit and in trouble with the state for practicing medicine without a license. (She's also in her seventies herself, putting her in the high-risk category, but that's a different issue.) I'm at a loss as to how our legal and licensing institutions can be adapted to allow for a quick increase in the number of personnel who can care for intubated patients. |
|
I.e., either the governor or the legislature says "it's no longer impermissible for RNs with inactive licenses to care for intubated patients". Or even "all inactive licenses shall be considered active on request of the licensee, until DD/MM/YYYY". Fiat, done.