[wayoutthere]

> I think a more traditional finance person will have trouble understanding it all as in some cases, there are no analogies to the traditional finance system (e.g. flashloans).

All "cryptocurrencies" are, in effect, complex securities that are derivatives of greater market factors. The crisis of 2007 showed the risk of using complex investment vehicles that were poorly understood by investors -- and the CDOs that were sold in the mid 00s were far more transparent and predictable than cryptocurrency. Given that crypto will always be one asset class among many, if the traditional finance system (which already operates outside any single fiat currency) can't understand it, they won't use it for anything more than speculation.

Using crypto as an investment vehicle requires a reasonably accurate assessment of risk. In the case of fiat currencies, central banks manage that risk so that investors can rely on the liquidity of the overall system without wiping out deposits. DeFi has no such mechanism, and no central bank to absorb a big hit temporarily in the case of a black swan event.

I still feel that cryptocurrency is just the 21st century version of penny stocks and junk bonds. Fiat currency works because its power as currency is secured by a government able to mobilize military and industrial power to solve market problems. The most heavily traded currencies (RMB, USD, EUR) are those backed by large industrial and military powers because those countries have the scale and political power to manage market risk. Centralized governance is a feature, not a bug.