[_gccu]

So, if you do the thing you suggested yourself, and NOT infer an assumption of a geopolitically motivated act coming from me, you will see that my logic as stated in point 1 and 2 is actually pragmatic and logical.

Assume no malicious intention.

How about we even assume that we paid for this stuff and Jack Ma didn't just hand it out for free. This is to remove your bias that a charitable gesture from someone, so that these products won't escape basic sensible scrutiny.

Are you seriously going to use the products to aid in this national emergency, that was literally made in the country that this virus originated from ... without testing it at all to verify that it is free of the virus that started it all?

[scotty79]

Sound logic leads to garbage conclusion when it starts with false premises.

Who knew it's really worth to learn about things you'd like to talk.

[_gccu]

If you pay close attention, you actually didn't refute my logic at all but called it "garbage" and "false".

Ok man, you need to learn how to think through stuff and come back when you're ready.

[scotty79]

I personally did not refute your logic because it doesn't matter if it's correct or not. It assumes falsehood and leads to "garbage" conclusions. Why would anyone want to consider what implication chain have you constructed between false and false?

[_gccu]

I'm guessing you have nothing to refute because you don't have an opinion that matters. Have a great day!

/End of pointless conversation with you/