[tekmaven]

IF this is the case, we should be way more prepared including possibly having a vaccine available.

[chucknthem]

Still no vaccine for SARS 18 years later, what makes you think we'll have a vaccine for this?

[nate_meurer]

SARS hasn't been seen in 15 years. Exactly whom did you expect would spend the time and money to develop a vaccine for it?

[sitkack]

Maybe we should develop responses to pathogens that have the ability to wipe humanity off the galaxy.

Given how close SARS and SARS-CoV-2 is, maybe the SARS vaccine could be applied to the current case.

[tasuki]

> Maybe we should develop responses to pathogens that have the ability to wipe humanity off the galaxy.

Not a bad idea, but isn't that a near-infinite set?

[nate_meurer]

I think that's likely, but it's understandably difficult to convince anyone to spend a few hundred million dollars to develop vaccine that might never be used.

[sitkack]

Seems like a pretty good deal right now. Our economic system has structural pathologies that make it extremely difficult to meaningfully organize whole populations.

[nate_meurer]

Yeah, ok, I think I agree with this. I have to believe that a sustained effort to develop coronavirus vaccines would bear fruit, whether actual vaccines or merely processes and knowledge, even if the particular motivating disease was no longer in circulation.