|
|
|
|
|
by ksec
2285 days ago
|
|
It is, I do not like the way CJK is being doubt with. Not to mention fonts dont include All the CJK variants of the fonts when I use the same word but need a JK variant because that is how it was suppose to be used. Even the "C" has traditional and simplified variant. Fortunately I think Unicode is pretty much done for Alphabetical languages. Someday if CJK design Unicode isn't good enough breaking it off to something better isn't entire impossible. |
|