|
|
|
|
|
by gpm
2290 days ago
|
|
> It's more the argument of what's actually making you money or providing competitive edge This would factor into the fair use analysis and the damages analysis, but not the analysis of whether or not the material was copyrightable in the first place. PS. For what it's worth I agree with you that this isn't copyright infringement, I just think it's important to get the arguments for why it isn't copyright infringement right. The two arguments I like best are "the merger doctrine" (If there is only one way to write something, in this case a API that existing java libraries can use, then it isn't copyrightable) and "fair use" (Vaguely speaking an exception for copying we as a society don't mind, defined in the law here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107). |
|