|
|
|
|
|
by lokedhs
2294 days ago
|
|
It's not wrong. What you're describing is not a timestamp. A timestamp is a point in time, and is the same everywhere (excluding relativistic effects). What you describe is definitely a valid use case (and having developed software that programs hardware that is controlled by a calendar, I have painful experience in this). However, it's not a timestamp. I'd call it time-of-day or wallclock. Some systems like SQL refers to it as simply "date" and "time". Whatever you prefer to call it, it's not a timestamp. |
|