[StavrosK]

Sure, but it's not as convenient as doing it automatically.

[dmit]

If you specify a catch-all url to open in No Container, would that work?

  !*.google.com , Google
  !* , No Container

[StavrosK]

Oh wow, that did work, thanks! It's odd, because the extension reordered the catch-all URL to the top, so I'm not sure how the specificity goes.

[wexxy]

I feel like that's probably by design. If you were in a session and clicking links, the assumption is if you're in the container already, you'd want to remain in the container. I don't disagree it would be nice for you to be able to specify domains per containers, but yeah, maybe that'll come in the future..

[StavrosK]

It's definitely by design, since the containers are meant to segregate accounts (e.g. a company container and a personal container), but a second mode would be useful since many people are using them for per-site isolation.