|
|
|
|
|
by pvaldes
2296 days ago
|
|
> more than 80k confirmed cases world wide, and two with a secondary infection. We should talk about the test error intervals. With that small amount of secondary cases, maybe it was a false positive the first time. No procedure is 100% failsafe and this is a price that we pay for being in the real world. Maybe the test was not applied correctly, was not stored accurately or was triggered by some artifact. |
|