|
|
|
|
|
by Barrin92
2295 days ago
|
|
> then it's completely orthogonal to the issue of who should be supplied with the masks. it's really not. The general population has already tuned out when you go into a ten paragraph long debate about the masks. The question is what 140 character message you give to people that induces the correct behaviour and in this case it's telling people bluntly that those masks don't help so people stop hoarding them. And they honestly don't help because most people don't know how to wear them or how often to change them anyway, so it's basically a meaningless discussion. |
|
Masks work, but healthcare workers need them more.
I think a seperate and perfectly valid question is if public consumption of masks has had any impact on the health supply chain.
My understanding is the two are unrelated. Masks are had to come by because manufacturers are selling their entire capacity to hospital and consumer stores are not being restocked. The state and the fed (in the US) have tens of millions of masks, and are releasing some but not all of them to the hospitals.
Hospitals are not competing for the masks at hardware stores or amazon.
If anything, I wish the media would urge people to wear masks with lower ratings than N95.
Perfect is the enemy of the good. Catching even half particulate when an infected person coughs would be huge.