[vertex-four]

In practice, nearly all your followers will be using fediverse software that understands and supports Move{Actor} in a similar way to Mastodon. There's not a massive amount of fediverse software - it's not like IndieWeb where everyone does their own thing - and the microblogging-focused software largely implements the same feature set.

[kick]

Most Mastodon instances currently running today don't support it.

[cptskippy]

It seems like virtual hosts would be reluctant to support it because it allows clients to move away from them. Vendor lock-in and such...

[kixiQu]

Most people aren't getting paid for running their instances, and are doing it for the kind of goodwill that is only amplified by enabling features.

[nenolod]

That depends on that software being deployed in a timely manner. There's plenty of instances out there still on Mastodon 1.6 and 2.0 because the admin installed it 2 years ago and hasn't updated since.

[grishka]

I probably need to look into supporting this in my federated social network thing. It does work with Mastodon and Pleroma right now, but it certainly could do better.