Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jghjghjgh 2298 days ago
On the other hand he hadn't commit anything in last decade and he would get credit for others work

On the other hand he's an author...

mixed feelings, I'd say

Autor: {name} Contributed in years: 2007-2009.

3 comments

That's the usual way of doing it. When a project grows and gains more contributions you can have the AUTHORS file have a list of former major contributors and project founders, current major contributors, and a note acknowledging the dozens of occasional and drive-by contributors (who get full credit for their patches in the revision logs).

His request is not unreasonable at all.

I think the license says his name should not have been removed in the first place?
"Original author" sounds more clear. I like how rpcs3 done it with "former authors" block at https://rpcs3.net/about