|
|
|
|
|
by chriscatoya
2298 days ago
|
|
Aside from the gallon of blood and pound of flesh we'll see called for in the public/political arena, I really doubt there's any viable fix that won't require pilot training. As I understand, the 737-MAX blunder is at the core a result of bad incentive alignment baked into their deal with Southwest: Boeing was trying to avoid any FAA "differences" simulator training requirements to make more money in a fleet sales order to Southwest Airlines. If the FAA required level-D simulator training, Boeing agreed to rebate Southwest $1 million for each MAX bought. The training would have cost Southwest $2000 per head. That's $18M for their 9,000 pilots. source: https://newrepublic.com/article/154944/boeing-737-max-invest... |
|
This issue has nothing to do with type ratings and pilot training.
Boeing had delegated authority from the FAA to certify portions of the 737-Max for airworthiness and certified the wiring harnesses based upon the fact that they're identical to the 737-NG's harnesses which were certified in the 90s.
Unfortunately the 737-NG was introduced in 1997, and new regulations introduced in 1998 made that design invalid for new aircraft. The 737-NG is allowed to fly because it's grandfathered in under the old design standard.
Boeing is trying to argue that the 737-Max should be grandfathered in as well since it's similar enough to the 737-NG and the NG has a proven safety record.