|
|
|
|
|
|
by throwsprtsdy
2293 days ago
|
|
|
Just because it is common doesn't mean it's not shady. And depending on what the "pseudo-activist role" entails, that could be a massive conflict of interest. If a person at Company A is steering business toward Company B because they have an investment in Company B, that could easily conflict with their obligations toward Company A. |
|
|
> so I can't make a distinction for this particular practice.
was meant to be a rebuttal to this
> just because it is common doesn't mean it's not shady.
so I think you walked right into it.
> If a person at Company A is steering business toward Company B
and that's company A's problem