|
|
|
|
|
by saiya-jin
2300 days ago
|
|
That doesn't make sense to me either. Take a busy German highway (as I don't know the average load on US ones), easily 100k cars per day. There are parts of highways which don't get replaced for 20 years easily. Plus apart from tiny fraction of north europe (and maybe Canada?), nobody ever uses studs. Back of the envelope math tells me 1 km of highway would lose some 730 tonnes of asphalt, per year (so 14,600 tonnes in 20 years). If we talk about normal car wear, this simply isn't happening on those unkempt roads. It would leave huge lanes of deeper surface where asphalt is lacking. There isn't visible wear on lanes that are used mostly by cars like that. Roads have mostly potholes. What happens on those roads is, sticky asphalt is worn away (but not at the mentioned rate), and what remains are stones which basically don't wear, and tires touch only that. At least highway surface I saw was like that. What damages roads greatly are trucks, especially overloaded ones (say limit is 15 tonnes, they take 22 tonnes and hope to not be checked... welcome to east european mentality). |
|
[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vierte-Potenz-Gesetz