|
|
|
|
|
by yvdriess
2291 days ago
|
|
Surely you mean dense one-hot? Technically, the sparse one-hot encoding is the most efficient in terms of memory footprint. You simply store the non-zero coordinates. The problem in practice for GPUs is that sparse vector/matrix operations are too inefficient. The whole point of something like this paper is to skip the entire 'densification' step and to directly deal with the sparse matrix input as a sparse matrix. The LSH is used in this paper improves on directly using SpMSpV, as that is also inefficient on CPUs, although to a lesser extent than GPUs. |
|