Could you cite more primary sources? It looks like India related entries on Wikipedia were totally hijacked by paid wiki moderators[0]. Now I cannot trust any India related entry on Wikipedia
OpIndia is a Brietbart-esque website. I trust the Wikipedia moderators more than OpIndia "journalists", who, not long ago, called for "war to defend the Hindus".
The systemic way in which the neo-facist government is taking control the narrative by tarnishing trust in institutions that have stood up well to scrutiny is unnerving.
> Could you cite more primary sources?
I'm pretty sure any primary source that doesn't fit a narrative would be dismissed as non-trustworthy because OpIndia wrote an "investigative" piece that refutes those sources, or because a prominent right-wing person tweets questioning the legitimacy and dismissing it as "fake news"? The incumbent is playing abhorrable politics.
> Now I cannot trust any India related entry on Wikipedia.
Sure, trust OpIndia instead? The standard bearer for journalistic ethics.
The systemic way in which the neo-facist government is taking control the narrative by tarnishing trust in institutions that have stood up well to scrutiny is unnerving.
> Could you cite more primary sources?
I'm pretty sure any primary source that doesn't fit a narrative would be dismissed as non-trustworthy because OpIndia wrote an "investigative" piece that refutes those sources, or because a prominent right-wing person tweets questioning the legitimacy and dismissing it as "fake news"? The incumbent is playing abhorrable politics.
> Now I cannot trust any India related entry on Wikipedia.
Sure, trust OpIndia instead? The standard bearer for journalistic ethics.