|
|
|
|
|
by fphhotchips
2305 days ago
|
|
I think it's worth noting that Troy may have wanted a firm with a global presence given that he's based out of the Gold Coast. The firms with big M&A reps in the USA don't necessarily have that same rep or presence down here, particularly in Brisbane. |
|
Troy is a deliberate thinker. I'm not second-guessing his choice.
The top M&A bankers in Australia are routinely one of a Swiss bank, an American bank and/or Macquarie [1]. The global banks are known as such because they have uniquely global reach. They're also uniquely expensive.
For a small deal, a boutique with global reach would be the default choice. They bring expertise with heavyweights who want a better work-life balance. They bring cost effectiveness with a reduced footprint.
The only reason to go with KPMG is because you know someone there you trust.
[1] https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/ubs-macquar...