|
|
|
|
|
|
by notatoad
2307 days ago
|
|
|
If that were their justification, they wouldn't need to define the acronym in the paper. However, in the introduction section of the actual paper they do define CNN. But they use the acronym 9 times before defining it, which is what's kinda weird. And the website isn't published in the CVPR, it's published on the internet. |
|
|