|
|
|
|
|
by james-skemp
2307 days ago
|
|
I thought the same thing as they. From the article: "The strike, which is not authorized by the union that represents the graduate student employees, is in violation of the current bargaining agreement, the university said." It's not clear that the union authorized it, despite what they're quoted as saying further down the article. I don't know enough about unions to know whether they could authorize a strike after not explicitly authorizing initially. It reads like the union didn't authorize the strike, but was fine seeing what would happen/causing a reaction. |
|
In practice, union bureaucrats really dislike wildcat strikes. They dissipate the negotiating power of the union; they basically show the entire hand of the union's most powerful weapon, at a time the union views as suboptimal. And it's usually the threat of a strike, not the strike itself, that companies are more scared of: a company highy desires to avoid a disruption, but if it's already in progress, they don't have an incentive to negotiate unless the union has a really strong hand.