|
|
|
|
|
by kick
2308 days ago
|
|
It's much higher level, chooses the worst bits of high-level languages to throw in, NeWS's spin of it was object-oriented which has since been shown to be a mistake, it's not as extensible, has too many stacks, introduces significant complexity for dubious benefit, so forth. Of course, whether or not PostScript is like Forth at all is a matter of debate, some religiously disagree. I'm somewhere in the middle on that. Old flamewar topic: http://wiki.c2.com/?ForthPostscriptRelationship The syntax is also slightly less nice, which is relevant for their question, but less quantifiable. |
|
What do you mean that NeWS or PostScript classes are not extensible? The little "e" in NeWS stands for "extensible".
And what is the correct number of stacks, in your opinion?
Please quantify what you can, and provide examples and links to code, and citations of other people who agree with your personal opinions like the number of stacks a language is supposed to have, the meaning of extensibility, or that object oriented programming languages are a mistake.