| tmux offers a level of abstraction that's missing from a tiling WM alone. You can have 1 tmux server running locally with many sessions (let's say 1 session per project). Then each session can have many windows (separate terminals that are full screen). And then each window can have many panes (splitting that window however you see fit). But if you went with a tiling WM alone without tmux, the WM's workspaces become sessions and your terminal becomes a window. So now you're stuck having to lean on your terminal emulator for tabs and splitting windows, but you're also on the hook for it having buffer searching, copying URLs, scrolling and other things. Most terminals are really bad at those tasks but tmux is great with them when combined with something like xterm (a low input latency terminal). Plus with tmux you have the option to easily save and restore everything with tmux-resurrect, and you can take your whole set up and replicate it on Linux, MacOS and even Windows with WSL and it all works the same as long as you find a good light weight terminal on each platform. I think there's a lot of value in using both a tiling WM and tmux together. tmux basically super charges any terminal into having world class support for everything a terminal needs to do. Even if it didn't persist sessions, it would still be really valuable. IMO it's severely underrated. People's eyes widen and still get impressed when terminal emulators add basic tab support. If they only knew what was lurking around the corner with tmux! |
If you have tiling wm, why would you want tabs or especially splitting in terminal emulator?
> Most terminals are really bad at those tasks
Just don't use bad terminal emulators? And good terminal emulators are better at those tasks than tmux