|
|
|
|
|
|
by faintrain
2309 days ago
|
|
|
Ha. I see what the writer did here. I was expecting a legal or technical solution of a different kind lol. Now if I were to send this article to the business team at my company in order to make a point about privacy I’m sure it would result in one way. They’d be pissed I wasted their time telling them not to track based on the views of the author who clearly doesn’t understand and hasn’t fully articulated the business implications of not tracking which are numerous. No track is like security regulations in healthcare. Yes it makes sense but when you think about the implications to the system as a whole there will be negative impact. 1. Loss of jobs (lack of data collection in business) 2. Loss of lives (greater security requirements in healthcare) Why loss of jobs? Because guys like Jeff Bezos will lay-off staff before impacting his and his shareholders wealth in any significantly negative way. Tell me why I’m wrong. |
|
|
With pleasure. Not having one's fundamental human right to privacy¹ undermined trumps the wants and needs of the business team at a certain company.
¹ Art. 12 UDHR, also mentioned in over 150 national constitutions