[reeses]

That was precisely my point. If this article had the sort of analysis and data that would be included in the sort of paper published in a social science journal, then it would be appropriate. I think the fact that almost all of the high-ranking posts are anecdotes that do not contribute data, or analogies to similar social problems (needle exchange, etc.) indicate that this post is more of a chit-chat post than anything with rigor.

I consider this article to be noise. Sure, it's interesting to read, but it's contributing to the creation of the sort of volume that will require either a) spending too much time skimming HN to find interesting content, or b) categorization à la Reddit/Slashdot/etc.

Chicken Scheme, the startup incubation in Chile, DSPL: Dataset Publishing Language, and "At St. Paul 'wet house,' liquor can be their life - and death."

Which of these doesn't belong?

p.s., sorry you got hit with the "I disagree with you, so I'm downvoting you" reaction on this one.