Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by masklinn 5603 days ago
Stop that, it's very silly: http://news.swpat.org/2010/03/transcript-tridgell-patents/
1 comments

Care to elaborate in your own words why you think so?

I will be quite peeved if something I have been doing for years with combinations of tools like Dropbox and Truecrypt becomes more difficult or costly to me or my customers due to a patent like this one.

Basically, it comes down to: the claims in patents are interpreted very narrowly.

If your device/method doesn't exactly match the claim elements of the independent claim(s) in Apple's patent - even one little difference in implementation is enough - then your device/method is not infringing. Don't worry, be happy.