|
|
|
|
|
by nochiel
5596 days ago
|
|
"You've fallen for it. Ives is the designer, not Jobs. Woz was the technological wizard, not Jobs." I don't think I've fallen for anything (in fact, I made strong mention of Ives with respect to industrial design). Being able to conceive good design and being able to guide good design are both signs of design competence; being able to conceive good technology and being able to guide its development are signs of technical proficiency. Jobs in his role as guide (or leader) is an exemplar. I never claimed (and I don't think anyone else did) that there are no "other talented people doing their jobs". Your rejoinder, rather than actually arguing against personality cults, is more a reminder that "a witty remark proves nothing." |
|
From your earlier comment:
> Jobs is a design and technological wizard who single-handedly righted the ship.
Thats you falling for the personality cult right there. That's also you claiming that Jobs somehow managed to fix Apple singlehandedly, which of course is wrong. Your comment about Ives trailblazing for years to come is quite amusing, given that Ive freely admits that he's heavily influenced by Dieter Ram's work (if you look at Ive's designs you'll see that he's following Ram's principles).
> Your rejoinder, rather than actually arguing against personality cults, is more a reminder that "a witty remark proves nothing."
That sentence appears to be a prime example of your quoted phrase.