|
|
|
|
|
by dhodell
2305 days ago
|
|
This policy hasn't changed in over a year. I'm on paternity leave now, but my job is Go on Fuchsia, and I work with people doing Rust on Fuchsia. None of us are concerned for our jobs based on this document (which we've collaborated on). This policy, like most technical decisions, may be amended when things change. We want people to have a consistent and stable platform to develop on, and if a language doesn't officially support our platform, it kind of doesn't make sense to support that language. And there's no commitment to support these languages for production services and end user development until there's a story for the stability of that toolchain on Fuchsia. This shouldn't be surprising. Make a new system, bootstrap your programming environments. Why bother offering support for environments you've not yet bootstrapped? As a thought experiment, consider the thousands of languages (including the tens or hundreds of popular ones) not listed on that page, and whether they're supported. (Edit: I accidentally a word.) |
|