|
|
|
|
|
by isaack
2311 days ago
|
|
I don't think Tailscale's use of 100.x.x.x address space conforms with the RFC, but I don't think that there are any better alternatives out there. Do note though, once people start abusing the 100.x.x.x space, it will become "just another private IP space" and lost its significance: RFC6598 requires that, when used as a routable address, the device must be able to do address translation across router interfaces when the addresses are identical on two different interfaces. [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598#section-4 |
|